TxDOT Resources

Mr. Tim Brown, Chair of the I-35 Corridor Advisory Committee: “Connectivity is a huge issue. Again, one of the weaknesses in the original concept is that it bypassed our communities rather than connect them. One of the strengths in the interstate system was it connected our major urban areas when it was conceived 50 years ago. One of the weaknesses in the TTC concept was that it bypassed our major urban areas and didn’t really address the issue of connectivity. We think in order for any transportation system to function, it’s got to integrate into the existing grid on the ground and allow traffic to reach the destination that they’re intending to go to… There was a fear early on that if we went out and built some new parallel corridors or parallel segments somewhere that there would be a diversion of funds and that we would begin to move away from an emphasis on maintaining our existing highway infrastructure. Regardless of what we build, the existing system that we have on the ground today will continue to serve a vast majority of the traveling public in these major communities that exist on Interstate 35… We think that public-private partnerships should share some of the cost in providing connectivity.”

I. Integrating Land Use/Economic Considerations

II. TxDOT’s Value Extraction Activities (VEAs)

III. Transportation Reinvestment Zones

IV. Miscellaneous Links

Austin District Congestion Management Projects

Austin District Contacts

Dallas District Contacts

Houston District Contacts

Strategic Projects Division

Rights-of-Way Division

Rights-of-Way and Eminent Domain

Innovating Financing/Debt Management Division

Hearings and Meetings Archive

Local Government Project Procedures

Introducing Smart Growth to Texas

Promoting Smart Growth Texas Style

Developing Sustainable Transportation Performance Measures for TxDOT’s Strategic Plan

CTR’s Getting the Parking Right for Transit-Oriented Development

CTR’s Moving Toward Implementation: An Examination of Organizational and Political Structures of Transit-Oriented Development

CTR’s Trip Internalization and Mixed-Use Development: A Case Study of Austin, Texas

CTR’s Multimodal Network Models for Robust Transportation Systems

CTR’s Simulating Land Use Impacts of Highway Development in the Texas Triangle: A Case Study of the Austin Metropolitan Region

CTR’s Can Transit Oriented Developments Reduce Austin’s Traffic Congestion?

A New Approach to Aesthetics Design Decision Making for Texas Highways

Creating Partnerships with Local Communities to Manage and Preserve Corridors

Integrating Regional Multimodal and Public Transportation Planning

CTR’s Opportunities and Challenges for High-Speed Rail Corridors in Texas

CTR’s High Speed Rail: A Study of International Best Practices and Identification of Opportunities in the U.S.

Presentation of IH 35 Passenger Rail Plan: Oklahoma City to South Texas by TxDOT’s Rail Division staff to CAMPO/City of Austin

Transportation and the Texas Economy

Transportation, Economic and Social Impacts of Light and Commuter Rail

The TxDOT Public-Private Feasibility Analysis Model

Utilities in the Right-of-Way

Utility Accommodation Options for Congestion in TxDOT Right-of-Way

CTR’s Findings on Determining Durations of Right-of-Way Acquisition and Utility Adjustment on Highway Projects

TXDOT’s Design Summary Report for IH-635 managed lanes project

CTR’s Comprehensive Evaluation of Transportation Projects: A Toolkit for Sketch Planning

CTR’s Seven TxDOT Strategic Research Briefs for FY 2011

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s